Surveys for Research Agencies

Account team can act faster when every answer explains where it came from. These prompts label study brief, insight workshop, and creative review by stakeholder role and review stage. Keep the study brief / sample quality thread visible in the review.

Start free Pricing

34 question types

Free to get started

5 min to launch your first survey

Research Agencies

Rate your experience

Experience

4.4

Speed

4.1

Trust

4.6

Submit

New response received

SurveyNinja

Use cases for Research Agencies

Capture study brief

Check creative review again after the fix and read the movement by channel and review stage. It keeps the decision tied to study brief / sample quality.

Diagnose sample quality

Turn campaign reporting into one open prompt when the score alone cannot explain the issue. Reviewers can compare the study brief / sample quality slice without rebuilding context.

Improve fieldwork updates

Compare fieldwork updates comments by stakeholder role before rewriting the whole workflow. The team sees whether study brief / sample quality moved after the fix.

Route insight workshop

Keep insight workshop comments visible beside the channel that created them. It turns study brief / sample quality into a concrete operating note.

Validate creative review

Ask immediately after brief and tag the answer by campaign so the first review starts from a concrete moment. The evidence remains anchored in study brief / sample quality.

Rotate campaign reporting

Separate sample quality from fieldwork updates so the next action is not based on a combined complaint. That separates study brief / sample quality from background noise.

SurveyNinja features for Research Agencies

Fieldwork updates review packet

Create a review packet for fieldwork updates with score, quote, segment, and last action in one place. This keeps the study brief / sample quality evidence separate.

Sample quality evidence board

Keep the raw comment, stakeholder role, and creative review together so account team can see why sample quality failed. Use it as the study brief / sample quality checkpoint.

Study brief moment tags

Tag the exact brief step behind study brief so the review does not collapse into general satisfaction. It protects the study brief / sample quality signal from being averaged away.

Study brief feedback by channel

Compare feedback on the study brief by campaign and channel. If only one group drops, fix that path before changing the launch. The next review starts from the study brief and sample quality context.

Creative review change proof

Use creative review to prove whether the adjustment improved client alignment for the segment it targeted. That gives the study brief / sample quality owner a narrower brief.

Insight workshop comments

Filter comments about insight workshop that mention a stalled handoff and share them with account team, then track the response before the next cycle. The study brief / sample quality pattern stays readable.

Signals to watch in Research Agencies feedback

Ask at creative review, when clients and stakeholders can still name the detail that shaped the score. Use it as the study brief / sample quality checkpoint.

Capture the blocker before clients and stakeholders leave the launch step. It protects the study brief / sample quality signal from being averaged away.

Link the comment to review stage so the owner sees the path that produced it. The next review can start from the study brief / sample quality context.

Ask immediately after brief and tag the answer by campaign so the first review starts from a concrete moment. That gives the study brief / sample quality owner a narrower brief.

How to collect Research Agencies feedback

The survey is a link: send it by e-mail, QR code or website widget, or in the SMS and messenger messages your own tools already send. It takes 1–2 minutes to answer

Mobile recovery pulse

Send a short mobile prompt when creative review or campaign reporting deserves a fast check. Use the result to prioritize the study brief / sample quality lane.

Manager review link

Share a private link when stakeholder role owners need comments before the next standup. The comment stays connected to study brief / sample quality.

Embedded launch prompt

Put the form inside the launch flow when fieldwork updates needs product or process evidence. This gives study brief / sample quality a clear before-and-after read.

Segmented email

Use email for campaign groups where the answer needs more explanation. The review can isolate study brief / sample quality before broader changes.

Brief follow-up

Send after brief so study brief feedback is captured before the detail fades. It keeps study brief / sample quality close to the moment that caused it.

Where to place surveys for Research Agencies

Brief

After Brief

What detail changed study brief most?

Mobile recovery pulse

Creative review

During Creative review

Where did sample quality create friction?

Segmented email

Launch

Before Launch closes

What would make fieldwork updates easier next time?

In-flow widget

Reporting

When Reporting starts

Which part of insight workshop needs follow-up?

Manager review link

How it works

Start from a template

Take a template from the library or describe your survey to the AI generator, then adjust the questions to your business. No technical skills required.

Start free

Share with your audience

Distribute via QR code, direct link, email, or embedded widget — wherever your customers are.

Analyze and act

Track responses in real time in your dashboard and make data-driven decisions that grow your business.

How to act on Research Agencies survey metrics

Study brief

campaign

Review Study brief by campaign before changing the full workflow. Keep the study brief / sample quality slice separate.

Sample quality

channel

Assign Sample quality to the owner closest to the moment and compare the next wave through study brief / sample quality.

Fieldwork updates

stakeholder role

Use verbatim Fieldwork updates answers to choose the next experiment for stakeholder role; keep study brief / sample quality attached.

Insight workshop

review stage

Escalate only Insight workshop comments with clear risk language, then validate study brief / sample quality in the following pulse.

Frequently Asked Questions

How should sensitive feedback be protected?

Restrict access when responses mention campaign plans, budgets, and stakeholder comments; reviewers still see the segment and action history they need. That gives the study brief / sample quality owner a narrower brief.

Which channel should start the program?

Use brief follow-up for coverage, then add a QR or embedded form when feedback must stay attached to creative review. The study brief / sample quality pattern stays readable.

What should the team track besides the score?

Track study brief, fieldwork updates, recurring comment themes, and whether assigned owners close the loop. It keeps the decision tied to study brief / sample quality.

How do comments become action items?

SurveyNinja keeps the rating, comment, channel, and stakeholder role together so the next owner does not rebuild context. Reviewers can compare the study brief / sample quality slice without rebuilding context.

Can this run as an ongoing program?

Yes. Keep the core rating stable, rotate a diagnostic such as campaign reporting, and compare movement by campaign over time. The team sees whether study brief / sample quality moved after the fix.

How do we avoid generic survey copy?

Remove any question that would not change sample quality, insight workshop, or the way account team protects client alignment. It turns study brief / sample quality into a concrete operating note.

Who should read the results?

Give account team the operational view, then share only the relevant channel slice with local owners. The evidence remains anchored in study brief / sample quality.

How fast should follow-up happen?

Urgent insight workshop comments should be reviewed in the same operating cycle; trend questions can wait for the next batch. That separates study brief / sample quality from background noise.

Can we use the same survey for every segment?

Keep the main rating shared, but adapt examples and routing for campaign, stakeholder role, and reporting. Use the result to prioritize the study brief / sample quality lane.

What makes the open question useful?

Anchor it to fieldwork updates or campaign reporting so the answer names a fix instead of repeating a mood. The comment stays connected to study brief / sample quality.

Plans for Research Agencies feedback programs

Choose the plan that matches your response volume and reporting needs. Full pricing

Free

$0/mo No time limit and no credit card required

Free — forever

Up to 50 surveys
100 responses/mo
30 questions per survey
Logic, export, API and MCP

Start free

Basic

$15/mo per month, billed annually

For small teams and regular feedback collection

100 surveys per account
1,000 responses per month
50 questions per survey
1 GB storage, files up to 100 MB
Image, video & audio in questions
Custom themes and your logo
Matrix, file upload and research question types
Response filters

Choose plan

Standard

$37/mo per month, billed annually

For marketing, HR and product research

500 surveys per account
5,000 responses per month
100 questions per survey
3 GB storage, files up to 300 MB
Response limit and deadline
Survey and question timers
No SurveyNinja branding
Incomplete responses

Choose plan

14 days free

Premium

$69/mo per month, billed annually

For large teams and advanced automation

∞ surveys per account
20,000 responses per month
∞ questions per survey
6 GB storage, files up to 500 MB
Custom roles for the team
Custom domain
AI report on responses
Promo codes

Start trial

Enterprise

On request

Custom plan for large companies

Unlimited resources
Up to 1,000,000 responses/month
Flexible task-based limits
Priority support
Number of seats
Monthly response limits
Disk space
Personal manager